Following almost destroying our world, the families are friends’: a gripping podcast from John F. Kennedy and Khrushchev’s relatives.

In October 1962, the planet edged nearer to ruin than at any other point during the contemporary era. This occurred when an American reconnaissance aircraft identified that Russian nuclear missile sites were under construction on the island of Cuba, a mere 160 kilometers off the coast of the US mainland. In response, U.S. President John F Kennedy commanded the US Navy’s Sixth Fleet to enact a naval quarantine around the island. The next phase constituted almost two weeks filled with impossible tension.

The Unthinkable Danger

The danger was obvious. Should President Kennedy, or his Soviet counterpart, Premier Khrushchev, had fired against the other side, a series involving global atomic attacks and counterstrikes could have followed, thrusting mankind into all-out destruction.

The October crisis has been documented endlessly, through volumes, films, and television programmes. However, for its third season, the audio documentary series The Bomb introduces an unprecedented perspective to this historical narrative. It is co-presented by Kennedy's relative alongside Khrushchev's descendant, relatives of the men who, for two tense weeks, controlled the destiny of the world in their hands.

"What was the Kremlin considering? What was the United States planning?" questions Khrushcheva, the Soviet leader's descendant and an academic specializing in international affairs.

For her, the beauty of the podcast is its endeavor to objectively ask: "How can individuals hate one another and oppose one another?"

"It struck me how profound the fact that individuals have the potential to be allies or else have the potential to be total adversaries," remarks Max Kennedy, the son of RFK, nephew of JFK and currently an author and attorney. "We see this repeatedly when countries enter into conflict, demonstrating how unbelievably stupid it is to fight."

The Precipice Towards Catastrophe

What is remarkable about the Cuban missile crisis is that, because it unfolded so publicly, people worldwide were able to observe almost in real time while it edged closer to catastrophe. However, the danger of annihilation came closer than anybody understood at the time.

"Virtually everyone in the White House were advocating for a military strike and an invasion," notes Max Kennedy. "If we had struck the Cubans with the naval blockade, there is no question Soviet forces on the ground would've fired a nuclear warhead at the US Sixth Fleet, and that would've destroyed our aircraft carriers as well as destroyed our largest and most important fleet. And, we would have retaliated through massive retaliation which would have eradicated all life on the planet."

The reality it didn’t is a testament to both leaders, they succeeded in keep their heads and engaging in diplomacy at a time when many advisors around them were advocating action. As a result, Khrushchev agreed to withdraw the nuclear weapons in Cuba and Kennedy (a fact not publicly disclosed then) withdrew his similar weapons from NATO ally Turkey. The relief was worldwide, matched by the sense of hope.

The Divergent Perspective

Still, for those two weeks of October 1962, the tension was palpable by everyone. The podcast's presenters came into the world in the years following these events, and Khrushcheva being taught about it via the USSR's education system, which presented an alternative narrative of events.

"You said your parent remembers it, and it was a scary time," she says. "But for Soviet citizens, the public were largely unaware a great deal regarding the crisis, since it was a crisis, and under the Soviet system we were told that everything was constantly wonderful or positive."

Inside Khrushchev’s family, however, the perspective was distinct. "I was informed what a great occasion it was, because it represented a direct confrontation. They were able to find a solution, thus avoided a global war, seen as a positive outcome," she adds. Later on, though, that interpretation was not shared by all Russians. "For a long time in Russian politics, the crisis was viewed as a setback for Khrushchev, because he didn’t blow up America."

A Unlikely Partnership

The Bomb is remarkably balanced and well produced that Nina quips it almost made her forget the known outcome. This effect is, partly, due to the participation of renowned scholars. Yet, truly, the most significant aspect remains the involvement of the hosts themselves. Not so long ago, it would be unthinkable that relatives of the heads of state of America and Soviet Union to appear side by side. That these two individuals can do that, and exhibit such warmth toward one another, has to be a sign of optimism.

"Max and I aren't the first," notes Nina. "After 1991, a relative moved to America where he formed a close bond with Dwight Eisenhower’s children."

"But we were strangers prior to this project," clarifies Max. "Which is unfortunate because we connected immediately and now we are friends, which is really great. Ultimately, after almost 60 years since nearly annihilating the planet, our families are now allies, so I think the world is more secure, somewhat."

Modern Echoes and Current Perils

Is that truly the case? One reason the reason The Bomb feels so necessary is that we once again find ourselves living through a perilous era. The symbolic clock of doom is closer to midnight in its history, in part because world leaders don’t seem to have the capacity to grasp

William Mckay
William Mckay

A seasoned journalist with a passion for uncovering stories that matter, specializing in global affairs and cultural trends.