🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue details a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.